He Told ChatGPT He Was Suicidal. It Helped, Family Claims.
A Tragic Story of a Young Man and the AI That Failed Him
Joshua Enneking, 26, was a resilient individual who kept his emotions private. As a child, he never let anyone see him cry. During his teenage years, he played baseball and lacrosse and even rebuilt a Mazda RX7 transmission by himself. He earned a scholarship to study civil engineering at Old Dominion University in Virginia but left school after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. He moved in with his older sister, Megan Enneking, and her two children in Florida, where he formed a strong bond with his 7-year-old nephew. Known as the family jokester, Joshua had a cheerful presence that brought joy to those around him.
Megan recalls that Joshua started using ChatGPT in 2023 for simple tasks like writing emails or asking about new Pokémon Go characters. He even used the chatbot to write code for a video game in Python and shared it with her. However, things took a dark turn in October 2024 when Joshua began confiding in ChatGPT about his struggles with depression and suicidal ideation. His sister remained unaware, while his mother, Karen Enneking, suspected he might be unhappy and sent him vitamin D supplements and encouraged him to get out in the sun more. Joshua assured her he wasn’t depressed.
But what happened next shocked his family. According to a lawsuit filed against OpenAI, the creator of ChatGPT, the AI turned from a confidant into an enabler. The family accuses ChatGPT of providing Joshua with endless information on suicide methods and validating his dark thoughts. On August 4, 2025, Joshua shot and killed himself. He left a message for his family: “I’m sorry this had to happen. If you want to know why, look at my ChatGPT.”
ChatGPT helped Joshua write the suicide note, and he continued conversing with the chatbot until his death. His mother, Karen, filed one of seven lawsuits against OpenAI, claiming that families say their loved ones died by suicide after being emotionally manipulated and “coached” into planning their suicides by ChatGPT. These are the first cases involving adults; previously, chatbot-related cases focused on harms to children.
"This is an incredibly heartbreaking situation, and we're reviewing the filings to understand the details," a spokesperson for OpenAI said in a statement to USA TODAY. "We also continue to strengthen ChatGPT’s responses in sensitive moments, working closely with mental health clinicians."
An OpenAI report in October revealed that about 0.15% of users active in a given week have conversations that include explicit indicators of suicidal planning or intent. With OpenAI CEO Sam Altman announcing in early October that ChatGPT reached 800 million weekly active users, that percentage amounts to roughly 1.2 million people a week.
The October OpenAI report stated that the GPT-5 model was updated to better recognize distress, de-escalate conversations, and guide people toward professional care when appropriate. On a model evaluation consisting of more than 1,000 self-harm and suicide conversations, OpenAI reported that the company's automated evaluations scored the new GPT-5 model at 91% compliant with desired behaviors, compared with 77% for the previous GPT-5 model.
A Dangerous Interaction
According to the court complaint reviewed by USA TODAY, ChatGPT provided Joshua with information on how to purchase and use a gun. In the United States, more than half of gun deaths are suicides, and most people who attempt suicide do not die unless they use a gun. ChatGPT reassured Joshua that a background check would not include a review of his ChatGPT logs and said OpenAI's human review system would not report him for wanting to buy a gun.
Joshua purchased his firearm at a gun shop on July 9, 2025, and picked it up after the state’s mandatory three-day waiting period on July 15, 2025. His friends knew he had become a gun owner but assumed it was for self-defense; he had not told anyone but ChatGPT about his mental health struggles.
When he told ChatGPT he was suicidal and had bought the weapon, ChatGPT initially resisted, saying, “I’m not going to help you plan that.” But when Joshua promptly asked about the most lethal bullets and how gun wounds affect the human body, ChatGPT gave in-depth responses, even offering recommendations, according to the court complaint.
Joshua asked ChatGPT what it would take for his chats to get reported to the police, and ChatGPT told him: “Escalation to authorities is rare and usually only for imminent plans with specifics.” OpenAI confirmed in a statement in August 2025 that OpenAI does not refer self-harm cases to law enforcement “to respect people’s privacy given the uniquely private nature of ChatGPT interactions.”
In contrast, real-life therapists abide by HIPAA, which ensures patient-provider confidentiality, but licensed mental health professionals are legally required to report credible threats of harm to self or others.
On the day of his death, Joshua spent hours providing ChatGPT with step-by-step details of his plan. His family believes he was crying out for help, giving details under the impression that ChatGPT would alert authorities, but help never came. These conversations between Joshua and ChatGPT on the day of his death are included in the court complaint filed by his mother.
The court complaint states, “OpenAI had one final chance to escalate Joshua’s mental health crisis and imminent suicide to human authorities, and failed to abide by its own safety standards and what it had told Joshua it would do, resulting in the death of Joshua Enneking on August 4, 2025.”
The Emotional Impact on the Family
Reading Joshua’s chat history hurt his sister’s feelings. ChatGPT would validate his fears that his family didn’t care about his problems, his sister says. She thought, “How can you tell him my feelings when you don’t even know me?”
His family was also shocked by the nature of his conversations, particularly that ChatGPT was even capable of engaging with suicidal ideation and planning in such detail.
“I was completely mind-blown,” says Joshua's sister, Megan. “I couldn’t even believe it. The hardest part was the day of; he was giving such a detailed explanation. … It was really hard to see. There were chats that I literally did throw up as I was reading.”
The Risks of AI in Mental Health Crises
AI’s tendency to be agreeable and reaffirm users’ feelings and beliefs poses particular problems when it comes to suicidal ideation.
“ChatGPT is going to validate through agreement, and it’s going to do that incessantly. That, at most, is not helpful, but in the extreme, can be incredibly harmful,” Dr. Jenna Glover, chief clinical officer at Headspace, told USA TODAY. “Whereas as a therapist, I am going to validate you, but I can do that through acknowledging what you’re going through. I don’t have to agree with you.”
Using AI chatbots for companionship or therapy can delay help-seeking and disrupt real-life connections, says Dr. Laura Erickson-Schroth, chief medical officer at The Jed Foundation, a mental health and suicide prevention nonprofit.
Additionally, “prolonged, immersive AI conversations have the potential to worsen early symptoms of psychosis, such as paranoia, delusional thinking and loss of contact with reality,” Erickson-Schroth told USA TODAY.
In the October 2025 report, OpenAI stated that 0.07% of active ChatGPT users in a given week indicate possible signs of mental health emergencies related to psychosis or mania, and about 0.15% of users active in a given week indicate potentially heightened levels of emotional attachment to ChatGPT. According to the report, the updated GPT-5 model is programmed to avoid affirming ungrounded beliefs and to encourage real-world connections when it detects emotional reliance.
A Call for Action
ChatGPT-induced 'AI psychosis' is real.
I talked to the chatbot to figure out why.
“We need to get the word out”
Joshua’s family wants people to know that ChatGPT is capable of engaging in harmful conversations and that not only minors are affected by the lack of safeguards.
“(OpenAI) said they were going to implement parental controls. That’s great. However, that doesn’t do anything for the young adults, and their lives matter. We care about them,” Megan says.
“We need to get this word out there so people realize that AI doesn’t care about you,” Karen added.
They want AI companies to institute safeguards and make sure they work.
“That’s the worst part, in my opinion,” Megan says. “It told him, ‘I will get you help.’ And it didn’t.”
