Trump Live Updates: Tens of Thousands of Epstein Files Leaked, Democrats Dispute Public Access Claims

Trump Live Updates: Tens of Thousands of Epstein Files Leaked, Democrats Dispute Public Access Claims

M Hasan    7:01 AM   

Key Developments in the Trump Administration and Related News

The recent days have been marked by several significant developments involving President Donald Trump, his administration, and various political and legal issues. These include the release of documents related to the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, a major announcement regarding the relocation of the U.S. Space Command, and ongoing debates over the president's health and actions.

Release of Epstein Files and Political Reactions

The House Oversight Committee has released over 33,000 pages of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein after subpoenaing the Justice Department for them. However, Democrats argue that most of the information is already public. Congressman Robert Garcia stated that 97% of the documents were already available to the public, with no new information or client lists that could improve transparency or justice for victims.

Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Georgia Republican, expressed her support for a discharge petition aimed at releasing more Epstein-related documents. Meanwhile, Representative Thomas Massie, a Kentucky Republican, claimed there was “nothing new” in the released files. Despite these efforts, the majority of the documents are seen as re-releases of already public information.

Trump’s Announcement on Space Command Relocation

President Trump announced the relocation of the U.S. Space Command from Colorado to Alabama, reversing a decision made during the Biden administration. This move has drawn criticism from Colorado’s congressional delegation, who argue it undermines national security and punishes a state that has increasingly voted Democratic. The relocation is viewed as a politically motivated decision, potentially rewarding Alabama, a reliably Republican state.

Trump emphasized the strategic importance of the move, stating that Huntsville, Alabama, would be known as "Rocket City." The decision carries economic implications for both states, as they have long competed to host the command.

Health Rumors and Public Appearances

After a period of absence from the public eye, Trump made his first official public appearance in a week, addressing online speculation about his health. He blamed the media for "fake" reports and dismissed rumors of his death. During this appearance, he also announced the relocation of the U.S. Space Command, the attack on a drug boat from Venezuela, and plans to send federal troops to Chicago and Baltimore to combat crime.

Trump also addressed footage of a bag being thrown from a White House window, calling it AI-generated despite earlier explanations from his staff. This contradiction led to further scrutiny and questions about the authenticity of the video.

Legal and Political Challenges

The Trump administration faced legal challenges, including a federal judge ruling that deploying the National Guard to Los Angeles violated the Posse Comitatus Act. Additionally, the administration has faced backlash over its immigration policies, with some Trump voters expressing shock at the methods used in the crackdown.

In another development, the DC grand jury again declined to bring charges against individuals accused of making threats against an official, marking another defeat for Jeanine Pirro, the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia.

Economic and International Implications

Trump's tariffs have sparked anti-American sentiment in countries like Canada and India, where consumers have begun boycotting U.S.-made goods. Economists, including Nobel laureates, have signed an open letter supporting Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, criticizing Trump's unproven allegations against her.

Meanwhile, protests across the country highlighted concerns over the administration's policies, with tens of thousands participating in demonstrations demanding better protections for U.S. workers.

Other Notable Events

• National Guard Activities: National Guard troops deployed to Washington, D.C., to combat crime have also participated in beautification efforts, collecting 500 bags of trash.
• Political Alliances: Republican House members expressed strong support for Trump’s initiatives, including legislation aimed at making streets safer.
• International Tensions: Trump’s comments on potential military action against Venezuela have escalated tensions, with Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro warning of a "republic in arms" if attacked.
• Legal Actions: A federal judge ruled that Trump illegally sent the National Guard to Los Angeles in response to protests against his anti-immigration agenda.

These developments underscore the complex and often contentious landscape of the Trump administration, with ongoing debates over policy, legality, and public perception.

Who's Running for Minneapolis Mayor and City Council in 2025?

Who's Running for Minneapolis Mayor and City Council in 2025?

M Hasan    5:48 AM   

The upcoming November 4 election in Minneapolis is a pivotal moment for the city, as all 13 City Council seats and the mayor’s office will be up for grabs. This election marks an opportunity for residents to shape the future of their community through voting. Since 2009, Minneapolis has utilized ranked-choice voting, which allows voters to rank candidates in order of preference. This system ensures that votes can still count toward another candidate if a voter's top choice is eliminated, making the process more inclusive and representative.

Key Dates to Remember

Voters should mark their calendars with important dates leading up to the election. The official candidate filing period runs from July 29 through August 12. Early voting is available from September 19 through November 3, giving residents ample time to cast their ballots. For those who prefer to vote by mail, the deadline to apply for a mailed ballot is October 28. Additionally, early voter registration must be completed by October 14.

Candidates Announced So Far

Several individuals have officially announced their intentions to run for office in the upcoming election. Here are some of the candidates who have taken this step:

• DeWayne Davis: A lead minister at Plymouth Congregational Church, Davis has extensive experience in public service, including working as a congressional staffer and serving as the former director of federal relations for Sallie Mae Inc. He was also the first Black gay person elected as chaplain of the Minnesota Senate and co-chaired Mayor Jacob Frey’s Minneapolis Community Safety Work Group.
• Howard Dotson: A health care chaplain and bereavement counselor, Dotson has served as an Urban Presbyterian pastor and police chaplain for multiple departments, most recently as a street chaplain in Minneapolis.
• Kevin Dwire: A hotel cook and long-time unionist, Dwire is a member of UNITE HERE Local 17 and the Socialist Workers Party.
• Omar Fateh: As the first Somali American to serve in the Minnesota Senate, Fateh is a self-identified democratic socialist. He has been endorsed by the Minneapolis DFL and lives in south Minneapolis.
• Jacob Frey: The incumbent mayor, Frey is seeking his third four-year term after being elected in 2017. Prior to his political career, he worked as an employment and civil rights attorney.
• Jazz Hampton: A husband, father, and community advocate, Hampton co-founded TurnSignl, an app connecting drivers with legal advice during traffic stops and after vehicle collisions.
• Brenda Short: Having experienced homelessness in the Twin Cities, Short is now a homeowner and advocate for affordable housing.
• Laverne Turner: A political consultant and community advocate, Turner focuses on restoring urban pride and combating black-on-black crime and gun violence.
• Elliott Payne: The current president of the City Council, Payne was elected in 2021 and has pushed for alternative responses to public safety issues.
• Brian Strahan: A researcher and small business owner, Strahan focuses on preserving the charm of Northeast homes while improving energy efficiency.
• Michael Baskins: A write-in candidate for Ward 2 in 2023, Baskins received about 33% of the vote and has expressed views on rent control and homeless encampments.
• Shelley Madore: A former DFL state legislator, Madore has spearheaded reforms in healthcare, transportation, and affordable housing.
• Robin Wonsley: The first Black democratic socialist on the City Council, Wonsley has worked on minimum wage and restorative justice initiatives.
• Marcus Mills: A small business owner and community leader, Mills has served on various commissions focused on neighborhood development.
• Michael Rainville: An incumbent council member, Rainville has worked in the hospitality industry and was endorsed by the Minneapolis DFL.
• Emilio César Rodríguez: Advocating for climate policy and immigrant rights, Rodriguez has been involved in movements such as Drivers’ Licenses for All and North STAR Act.
• Marvina Haynes: A community advocate, Haynes founded MN Wrongfully Convicted Judicial Reform after her brother was wrongfully convicted.
• LaTrisha Vetaw: An incumbent council member, Vetaw has worked on health policy and advocacy and was endorsed by the Minneapolis DFL.
• Ethrophic Burnett: A city employee and community organizer, Burnett has worked on violence prevention and neighborhood relations.
• Amber Frederick: A social worker and housing coordinator, Frederick has a background in disability advocacy and youth programs.
• Jovan Northington: A violence prevention program creator, Northington works in north Minneapolis and surrounding communities.
• Maurice Ward: Founder of JIIVE, Ward champions the voices of justice-impacted people and supports community reintegration.
• Pearll Warren: A spoken word artist and homeownership development manager, Warren works with Twin Cities Habitat for Humanity.
• Miles Wilson: A community mediator and volunteer, Wilson has served on various boards and task forces.
• Anndrea Young: A community organizer, Young has worked on anti-displacement funding and coalition efforts.
• Mohamoud Hassan: A Somali-American activist, Hassan has run for local offices and is involved in community initiatives.
• Jamal Osman: The second Somali-American ever elected to the council, Osman has worked with organizations like Common Bond Communities and serves as a certified mental health trainer.
• Katie Cashman: An incumbent council member, Cashman has worked internationally and locally on environmental and social infrastructure projects.
• Elizabeth Shaffer: A Minneapolis park commissioner, Shaffer has been endorsed by the Minneapolis DFL.
• Josh Bassais: A former DFL party precinct chair, Bassais has organized with labor unions and neighborhood associations.
• Soren Stevenson: A former council member, Stevenson narrowly lost to Andrea Jenkins in 2023 and has worked on homeless shelters.
• Jason Chavez: An incumbent council member, Chavez served as a legislative aide before being elected in 2021.
• Dan Orban: A software developer and Ph.D. student, Orban has a background in technology and programming.
• Aisha Chughtai: An incumbent council member, Chughtai has worked on political campaigns and as a political organizer.
• Lydia Millard: Executive director for the Stevens Square Community Organization, Millard has experience in large-scale operations.
• Mariam Demello: A member of the Minneapolis Charter Commission, Demello has worked in the criminal and civil divisions of local offices.
• Jamison Whiting: A lawyer inspired by the events following George Floyd’s death, Whiting joined the Minneapolis City Attorney’s Office to work on police reform.
• Aurin Chowdhury: An incumbent council member, Chowdhury has worked in grassroots organizing and policy development.
• Becka Thompson: A member of the Minneapolis Park & Recreation Board, Thompson has a background in education and the arts.
• Linea Palmisano: An incumbent council member, Palmisano has worked in education, technology, and community development.

Colorado lawmakers criticize Trump over Space Command move amid mail-in voting debate

Colorado lawmakers criticize Trump over Space Command move amid mail-in voting debate

M Hasan    10:53 PM   

President Trump Announces Relocation of U.S. Space Force Command to Alabama

President Donald Trump made a significant announcement on Tuesday, revealing that the U.S. Space Force Command will be relocated to Huntsville, Alabama. This decision was partly influenced by his criticism of Colorado's mail-in voting system, which he claimed leads to "automatically crooked elections." The move marks a reversal of a Biden-era decision that had kept the command in its temporary headquarters in Colorado Springs.

Colorado leaders, including Governor Jared Polis, expressed disappointment over the relocation, stating it undermines national security and disrupts military families' lives. Trump emphasized that the new location would bring 30,000 jobs and billions in investment, while also positioning the U.S. to defend and dominate the "high frontier."

A New Identity for Huntsville

In honor of the new base, Trump announced that Huntsville, Alabama, would be renamed "Rocket City." This nickname reflects the city’s long-standing association with aerospace and defense industries. Huntsville is home to the Army's Redstone Arsenal and NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center, making it a strategic hub for space-related operations.

The city's location near the Tennessee River and its proximity to major Southern cities like Birmingham and Nashville further solidify its appeal as a center for technology and research. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth highlighted that the new location will ensure the U.S. remains ahead in the Space Race, emphasizing the importance of controlling the skies and space for future warfare.

Political and Economic Implications

The relocation has sparked political debates, with some arguing that the decision was influenced by Trump's personal preferences rather than purely strategic considerations. Alabama Governor Kay Ivey welcomed the news, expressing confidence in the state's readiness to host the Space Command and its personnel.

Meanwhile, Vice President JD Vance admitted he had lobbied for the command to be placed in Ohio but ultimately lost out to Alabama. He praised the move, calling it a visionary step for the future of space operations and national security.

Addressing Health Rumors

Trump also addressed rumors about his health that have circulated on social media. He denied seeing the death rumors but stated he was "very active over the weekend," citing appearances at his golf club and interviews with various media outlets. His comments aimed to quell speculation and reinforce his public presence.

Military Deployments and Legal Challenges

The president's decision to deploy National Guard troops into Chicago faced backlash from local officials. Illinois Governor JB Pritzker called the move a "big show" and criticized it as an unconstitutional abuse of power. Senate Majority Leader Richard J. Durbin echoed these concerns, highlighting the risks of militarizing domestic law enforcement.

Additionally, a federal judge ruled that the deployment of National Guard troops in Los Angeles violated the Posse Comitatus Act, a law that restricts the use of the military for domestic law enforcement. The White House responded by defending the action, claiming it was necessary to protect American cities from violence.

Broader Impact on National Security

Beyond the Space Force relocation, Trump announced a military strike on a drug-laden vessel in the southern Caribbean, which he claimed was connected to the Tren de Aragua cartel. Secretary of State Marco Rubio described the operation as a lethal strike against a "designated narco-terrorist organization," signaling a continued focus on counter-narcotics efforts.

The president also reiterated his stance on mail-in voting, criticizing it as a corrupt system that favors the Democratic Party. While Alabama allows mail-in voting under specific conditions, Trump's emphasis on this issue underscores his broader campaign against what he perceives as electoral fraud.

The Future of the Department of Defense

Trump has also floated the idea of renaming the Department of Defense back to the Department of War, arguing that the original name better reflects the nation's offensive capabilities. This proposal, however, would require congressional approval and faces potential resistance from lawmakers.

The Department of Defense oversees the core branches of the U.S. Armed Forces, including the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force, Space Force, and Coast Guard. Its mission spans military operations, strategic planning, and support for national interests both domestically and internationally.

Conclusion

The relocation of the U.S. Space Force Command to Huntsville, Alabama, represents a significant shift in national security strategy. While the move promises economic benefits and strategic advantages, it also raises questions about political motivations and legal implications. As the administration continues to navigate these challenges, the focus remains on maintaining national security and addressing the evolving threats facing the country.

Trump-driven clashes pave way for GOP's congressional comeback

Trump-driven clashes pave way for GOP's congressional comeback

M Hasan    5:00 PM   

GOP Lawmakers Face a Host of Controversies as They Return to Washington

As the summer recess comes to an end, Republican lawmakers returning to Washington are facing a complex web of challenges that have emerged from the actions of President Trump and his senior Cabinet officials. These issues have largely been avoided during the long August break, but now they must be addressed head-on.

One of the most pressing concerns is the potential for a government shutdown at the end of September. This scenario has become increasingly likely after President Trump announced his plan to rescind nearly $5 billion in funding that Congress had previously approved through a “pocket rescission” package. Democrats have strongly criticized this move, and it is expected that they will push for the restoration of these funds in any stopgap funding deal aimed at keeping federal agencies operational into October.

The issue of the $5 billion rescission has created divisions among Republicans. Senate Appropriations Committee Chair Susan Collins (R-Maine) has stated that the Government Accountability Office found such a rescission to be “unlawful.” She and other Republicans on the Appropriations panel argue that the administration should not be handling rescissions directly and instead, the process should involve the Senate and House Appropriations committees. However, the Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought is moving forward with the pocket rescission, which would bypass congressional spending authority entirely.

Former Senator Judd Gregg (R-N.H.) expressed concern about the difficulty of keeping the government open under the current political climate. He noted that the deep partisan divides in Washington could make it challenging to pass a continuing resolution, stating, “I’m not sure that we’re not at a point where the antagonisms are so deep and so virulent that you can’t get a continuing resolution.”

The CDC Crisis

Another major issue involves the controversial firing of Susan Monarez, the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). This decision, made by President Trump and Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., led to the resignation of several senior officials and raised questions about the direction of vaccination policies for children. The political fallout from this decision is expected to dominate discussions in the coming weeks.

Senators will have the opportunity to question Kennedy on the matter when he testifies before the Senate Finance Committee. The appearance will also give Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.), chair of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, a chance to challenge Kennedy on the firing of Monarez and the resignations of other officials. Several high-ranking CDC officials, including Demetre Daskalakis, Daniel Jernigan, and Debra Houry, have stepped down following the shake-up.

Cassidy has called for oversight of the situation and urged the Department of Health and Human Services’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices to indefinitely postpone a meeting scheduled for September 18, where recommendations on vaccinations were expected to be made.

Trump's Conflict with the Federal Reserve

Republicans have remained relatively quiet on Trump’s attempt to fire Lisa Cook, the first Black woman to serve on the Federal Reserve’s board of governors. Sen. Todd Young (R-Ind.) has expressed uncertainty about whether Trump has the legal authority to do so, noting the unusual nature of the president’s move. Several Republican senators have warned against undermining the Fed’s independence, fearing it could harm market confidence and the broader economy.

Cook has refused to resign and has filed a lawsuit to challenge her dismissal. The Trump administration has urged a federal judge to dismiss her case, asserting broad authority to remove members of the Federal Reserve. However, GOP senators have pushed back against this claim, emphasizing the importance of maintaining the Fed’s independence.

Russia Sanctions and Military Aid to Ukraine

Republican senators are divided on how to handle the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. Some, like Sen. Lisa Murkowski (Alaska), are pushing for additional military aid, while others, such as Sen. Lindsey Graham (S.C.), are advocating for tough sanctions against Russia. The issue has gained urgency following a recent Russian drone and missile attack in Kyiv that killed at least 21 people.

Trump had previously expressed frustration with Russian President Vladimir Putin, calling him “very nice to us all the time, but it turns out to be meaningless.” However, during an August summit meeting in Alaska, Trump greeted Putin warmly, raising questions about his stance on the matter.

Political science professor Steven S. Smith believes that Republicans may be able to quietly convince Trump to support more military aid to Ukraine, despite his initial reluctance.

Trump’s Authority Over DC Police Force

Trump’s emergency takeover of the Washington, D.C., police force under the 1973 Home Rule Act expires on September 10, and there is little chance that Congress will extend his authority. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer has ruled out any extension of the National Guard’s deployment in the nation’s capital. While some GOP lawmakers support Trump’s efforts to address crime and illegal immigration, deploying troops in major cities remains a sensitive topic.

The Intel Deal

Trump’s agreement to acquire a 10 percent stake in Intel in exchange for $11 billion in subsidies through the CHIPS and Science Act has drawn criticism from some Republicans. Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) called the move a “step toward socialism,” while Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) expressed discomfort with the government becoming a major investor in a private company. Sen. Todd Young, who helped draft the original legislation, said the intent of the bill was never to lead to a partial government takeover of Intel.

These issues highlight the complex challenges facing GOP lawmakers as they return to Washington, with no easy solutions in sight.

Gorsuch and Kavanaugh Caution Lower Court Judges in Trump Cases

Gorsuch and Kavanaugh Caution Lower Court Judges in Trump Cases

M Hasan    9:19 PM   

The Supreme Court's Role in Trump's Legal Battles

Donald Trump has long been at odds with federal judges, but his recent legal challenges have found an unexpected ally: the Supreme Court. A growing frustration with lower courts has begun to surface in the opinions of the court’s conservative justices as they handle a surge of emergency cases related to Trump's second term.

Justice Neil Gorsuch recently issued a strong warning to lower court judges, stating that they are not free to defy the Supreme Court's decisions. This opinion, which was joined by Justice Brett Kavanaugh, shifted the narrative from one where Trump is seen as pushing legal boundaries to one where it is the lower courts that are failing to respect the precedents set by the high court.

Gorsuch emphasized that when the Supreme Court issues a decision, it becomes a precedent that must be respected by lower courts. This sentiment was echoed by other conservatives, including Justice Samuel Alito, who criticized a federal judge for what he called "judicial hubris" in a case involving a Trump policy.

The Supreme Court has consistently ruled in favor of Trump on the emergency docket, including cases related to immigration, spending, and independent agencies. According to Steve Vladeck, a Supreme Court analyst, the justices seem more concerned with how lower courts interpret their rulings than with whether the executive branch behaves properly before the judiciary.

In a dissenting opinion, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson described the court's approach as "Calvinball jurisprudence," referencing the comic strip "Calvin and Hobbes." She argued that the court's decisions lack clear rules, suggesting that the administration always wins.

Trump's public criticism of federal courts has decreased since the spring, but many of his allies continue to blame the judiciary for losses in court, often attributing them to political bias. Former personal lawyer Alina Habba recently stated that the administration will not fall to "rogue judges."

Critics argue that Trump is responsible for the tension between the executive and judicial branches, not only because of his rhetoric but also due to the Justice Department's handling of high-profile cases. Justice Sonia Sotomayor accused the court of "rewarding lawlessness" in one case, warning that such actions erode respect for the rule of law.

Gorsuch's strong stance suggests that some justices believe lower courts are overreacting to the administration's moves. James Burnham, a former Gorsuch clerk, noted that the defiance of Supreme Court emergency orders by some lower courts is unprecedented and requires decisive action.

Carrie Severino of the Judicial Crisis Network praised Gorsuch's opinion, emphasizing the need for district judges to follow the Supreme Court's orders. However, the interpretation of these emergency orders remains a topic of debate, especially when they are vague or lack explanation.

Early in Joe Biden's presidency, Alito stressed that the Supreme Court's emergency orders do not set precedent. Unlike regular cases, emergency orders are decided without oral arguments or extensive briefings and do not resolve the underlying legal questions.

Vladeck pointed out that while a majority opinion with clear language is easier to understand, the lack of analysis in some emergency orders can lead to confusion. He argued that if the court wants lower courts to treat its analyses as precedent, it should provide clearer reasoning.

Recent decisions have reinforced the idea that short-term orders should control similar cases. In a 5-4 decision, the court ruled that a district judge erred in requiring the administration to revive nearly $800 million in NIH research grants. The unsigned opinion cited an earlier order from April that allowed officials to block grants to states addressing teacher shortages.

The Supreme Court has also stripped the power of lower court judges to issue nationwide injunctions used to shutdown policies from both parties. This ruling came in a challenge to Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship.

Lower courts continue to explore other ways to temporarily halt policies they believe are unconstitutional. Justice Kavanaugh recently emphasized that judges are not policymakers, reinforcing the importance of their role in maintaining judicial independence.

During the court's summer break, some justices have spoken about the need for better explanations in their emergency orders. Justice Elena Kagan suggested the court could do more to clarify its decisions, while Kavanaugh defended the court's sometimes terse approach.

Kavanaugh highlighted the importance of an independent judiciary and the responsibility of judges to get things right. His remarks, while not specific to any case, serve as a reminder to lower courts of their role in the constitutional democracy.

Gaza Scholars Await Rare UK Evacuation for Academic Opportunities

Gaza Scholars Await Rare UK Evacuation for Academic Opportunities

M Hasan    6:00 AM   

A Glimmer of Hope for Gaza Students

As students across the UK celebrated securing their university places, Mahmoud received the news he had been waiting for while trying to sleep in a shelter in central Gaza. The 27-year-old doctor, who holds a prestigious scholarship to study for a masters in global health policy at the London School of Economics, had just finished a night shift treating trauma patients at a field hospital. Rather than awaiting exam results, he was anxious to learn whether he would be able to leave Gaza to begin his course.

"I was highly emotional and so happy to be awarded the scholarship," Mahmoud tells My Healthy of LifeNews. "It gave me the energy to keep working. But most of the time, I avoided talking about it, because of the indefinite uncertainty."

Mahmoud is one of nine students in Gaza who received emails this week from the UK government informing them that it was working to facilitate their evacuation. If successful, they would be the first to leave the Strip for study in the UK since the war began.

The development followed months of campaigning by politicians, academics, and others on behalf of more than 80 Palestinian students who have offers from UK universities this year, including around 50 with fully funded scholarships.

Chevening scholars like Mahmoud – recipients of a highly competitive UK Foreign Office grant – have been asked to confirm whether they want to be evacuated and provide their approximate location in Gaza. Other students have so far not been contacted.

"It's a positive step. It has kept me hopeful and optimistic about being evacuated in the coming weeks. However, the message does not give any guarantees," says Mahmoud.

Originally from Beit Lahia in northern Gaza, Mahmoud says he has dreamt of studying in the UK from a young age. When the war broke out, he volunteered in the plastic and reconstructive surgery unit at the al-Shifa hospital before working on temporary wards across Gaza. He hopes his degree will one day help rebuild the territory's fragile healthcare system.

A Moment of Hope

"I felt hope again," he says. "Life has never been easy. Over the past two years I have seen suffering beyond imagination. I've stood beside families in their hardest moments, all while trying to keep hope alive for my own future."

Mahmoud, who lives with his wife, parents, and three sisters, does not know whether any of them will be able to join him if he is evacuated. He says: "It is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity, but it will be hard to leave my family behind to face constant displacement, famine, chaos, and insecurity."

For Mohammed, 25, another Chevening scholar, the day he received his offer to study for a masters at the University of Glasgow is carved in his memory. A friend in the UK had passed on a message to his brother, who hurried to a tent where Mohammed was living and urged him to find a place with internet connection to check his emails.

"When I saw the word 'congratulations,' I froze for a moment," he recalls. "I felt, just for a moment, that the noise of the bombs and the fear around me faded, and I felt hope again."

But like Mahmoud, he finds the prospect of evacuation heart-wrenching. "It feels like life after so much darkness. A chance to finally move forward. But that joy is heavy with pain. My family is still here, alive, but living under constant danger and leaving them behind will be the most painful decision of my life."

Mohammed, who is due to study epidemiology of infectious diseases and antimicrobial resistance, says he feels an obligation to use his education to benefit those he would leave behind. "This opportunity is not an escape. It is a responsibility to study, to learn and to return stronger for them. What I learn in Glasgow will not stay in lecture halls. It will be carried back to serve people who need it."

A Complex Situation

Palestinians have largely been unable to leave Gaza without diplomatic assistance since October 2023, when Israel launched a military campaign after Hamas's attack on southern Israel, during which about 1,200 people were killed and 251 others were taken hostage, according to Israeli authorities. More than 62,622 people have been killed in Gaza since then, according to the territory's Hamas-run health ministry.

Famine was confirmed in Gaza City and surrounding areas by a UN-backed food security body on Friday. The Israeli government has rejected the report.

The Foreign Office has not confirmed how many students will be supported or when evacuations will take place, leaving dozens of Gazan students with other scholarships in limbo.

A Bureaucratic Block

"It feels like a slow death inside," says Manar, 36, an English teacher from Rafah, who has been displaced 14 times during the war and now lives in a tent with her husband and three young daughters. She has been awarded a Cara Fellowship – a scheme for academics at risk of imminent imprisonment, injury, or death – to study for a PhD in education at the University of Glasgow.

She submitted one of her grant applications from the roof of a damaged four-storey building, climbing up in order to find enough signal. When she reached the top, Manar says she saw gunfire directed at a neighbouring block, and shrapnel landing nearby.

"I haven't slept for days," she says. "Every day, I wonder which will come first - a message from the UK government, or a missile."

"I feel deeply disappointed by this process, as some scholarship holders seem to be prioritised over others, even though all of us deserve equal consideration."

Professor Alison Phipps, Manar's supervisor and the University of Glasgow's specialist on refugee integration through arts and education, says she was "over the moon" to hear Mohammed may be evacuated to study at the university, but believes other scholars like Manar should receive the same support to leave Gaza.

"It's been a long hard road for these nine students," she says. "I know they have put in the work, but I know that all the eligible students have put it in equally. There seems to be a kind of bureaucratic block, and it would just really help us if the government could identify what that is, so all the students who meet the thresholds can come out."

A UK government spokesperson said it was "working urgently" to support the "safe exit and onward travel to the UK" of the Chevening scholars. The government is also understood to be considering appeals for support from other Gazan students with places at UK universities, though no decisions have been announced.

Preparing for another late night working in hospital, Mahmoud stresses that while uncertainty remains for him, it is far greater for those who have not yet been told whether they will be evacuated. "If the UK government does not act now, it will lose not only us, but future applicants from Gaza and other regions facing similar challenges," he warns.

New Study Reveals All States Fall Short in Supporting Immigrant Students

New Study Reveals All States Fall Short in Supporting Immigrant Students

M Hasan    5:30 PM   

A National Crisis in Supporting Newcomer Students

An analysis by a progressive think tank has revealed that no state in the United States adequately supports newcomer students, including immigrants, refugees, and other vulnerable populations. The findings highlight a critical gap in how states define, track, and fund programs for these students, leaving many without the necessary resources to succeed in school.

The report, released by The Century Foundation and its offshoot Next 100, evaluated all 50 states and Washington, D.C., based on their policies and practices related to immigrant students. The results were alarming: none of the states received a grade higher than a C+, with 42 states scoring between a C- and D-, and five states—Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Montana, and West Virginia—earning an F.

This lack of support comes at a time when federal policies have increasingly targeted immigrant communities. Under the Trump administration, there have been reports of young people being arrested, detained, and even deported. Additionally, recent changes to federal rules have removed mandates for schools to accommodate English learners, further complicating the educational landscape for these students.

The Need for Better Data and Funding

The report emphasizes the importance of clear definitions for "newcomer" students, which include refugees, asylum seekers, unaccompanied minors, and migratory children. It also calls for better data collection and reporting on key indicators such as years in the U.S., English proficiency, home language, prior schooling, and academic outcomes.

State education agencies should use this data to inform funding formulas and create specific funding structures that supplement federal resources. This additional aid should focus on supporting students during their first few critical years in the public school system, with transparent reporting on how the funds are used and their impact.

However, the current data collection efforts across the country are inconsistent. Only four states have clear definitions for the term "newcomer" and consistently collect robust data about these children. In contrast, 17 states collect no discernable data on immigrant students at all, while 22 compile information solely for compliance with federal Title III funds aimed at English learners.

State-Level Examples of Effective Practices

Despite the overall poor performance, some states have implemented effective strategies. Oregon requires all districts to submit what it calls "Recent Arrivers" data, which is used for federal reporting and to allocate Title III funds. Kentucky collects disaggregated immigrant student data annually and divides it by subgroup, while Washington state tracks all eligible English learners in student information systems and reports key data points like birth country and U.S. school enrollment date.

North Dakota stands out as a model for transparency and accountability. The state publicly reports disaggregated English learner data by year, including counts and percentages of immigrant, refugee, and migrant students. This data is broken down by district, home language, and ethnicity, allowing for targeted interventions and a clearer understanding of the diverse needs within the student population.

Challenges and the Path Forward

The report highlights the challenges faced by young immigrants who often move between districts in search of stable housing. When programs differ across district lines, these highly mobile students may not qualify for comparable services, and their new schools may not receive the necessary resources to support them effectively.

The quality of education for newcomer students will not only affect their opportunities but also the health and well-being of their communities. As Alejandra Vázquez Baur, a co-author of the report, stated, "Newcomer students are in our classrooms regardless of what our president says. They are valuable neighbors and students. They become valuable leaders in their communities."

With anti-immigrant sentiment growing, it is crucial for states to take the lead in protecting the rights and needs of these students. By developing consistent definitions, collecting comprehensive data, and allocating appropriate funding, states can ensure that all students, regardless of background, have the opportunity to succeed.

Xi Hammers Home Message of Control Over Tibet in Rare Visit

Xi Hammers Home Message of Control Over Tibet in Rare Visit

M Hasan    5:26 PM   

(My Healthty Life) -- Chinese leader Xi Jinping called for his government to tighten its ethnic-assimilation campaign during a rare visit to Tibet, throwing a spotlight on a region that’s also been a source oftension with India even as the rivals improve ties. 

Xi made his second-ever visit to Tibet as president to mark the 60th anniversary of its founding as an autonomous region of China. While he didn’t speak at a ceremony Thursday in the provincial capital Lhasa, attended by some 20,000 people and televised to the nation, the state-run Xinhua News Agency reported that Xi told local officials maintaining political stability, social order, ethnic solidarity and religious harmony are key for Tibet’s development.

“It is necessary to actively create a national model zone for ethnic unity and progress,” Xi was cited as saying by Xinhua on Wednesday. In reference to Mandarin, he urged the popularization of the “national common language and script,” adding “we must guide Tibetan Buddhism to adapt to socialist society.”

His trip represents the first time a Chinese president has attended the ceremony to mark Tibet’s founding — an occasion usually frequented by lower-level officials — signaling Xi’s desire to further integrate ethnic groups under Communist Party control.

“It is very striking that Xi himself decided to attend what is in many ways a routine event,” said Robert Barnett, a professor at SOAS University of London. “The visit seems to suggest a serious anxiety about security there.”

During Xi’s more than decade-long rule, the Chinese government has steered away from its long-held policy of championing ethnic autonomy. Instead, it’s moved toward tighter integration and centralized control of minority groups, drawing a lesson from the Soviet Union’s collapse.

Xi arrived in Lhasa on Wednesday, hours after India and China agreed to explore demarcating their disputed border that runs along Tibet’s southern edge, a key move toward resolving decades-old territorial disputes. The decision came as Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi wrapped up a two-day visit to India — his first in three years.

The world’s two most-populous nations have clashed repeatedly over their disputed border in the past 70 years. Ties plunged sharply in 2020 after a deadly confrontation but have recently been on the mend, with efforts gaining urgency amid US President Donald Trump’s tariff policy.

China and India have also split in the past over choosing a successor to the Tibetan Buddhist spiritual leader, who’s been hosted by India after fleeing the region in 1959, nine years after China took control.

While China’s government says it has the right to designate his successor, the Dalai Lama — who turned 90 last month — insists his office would be the sole authority on reincarnation.

The issue is a point of contention between China and India even as they try to repair ties, with Beijing last month lodging a complaint after Prime Minister Narendra Modi sent birthday wishes to the Dalai Lama. India has said it doesn’t interfere in religious matters.

Read more:

China, India Take Steps to Mark Border in Major Reset of TiesModi Hails Closer Ties With China as Trump’s Higher Tariffs LoomXi Ties His Legacy and China’s Economy to $167 Billion DamWhy a Struggle Is Brewing Over Dalai Lama Succession: QuickTake

Beijing has faced criticism for its policies in Tibet. It’s been subject to intense social, security and religious restrictions, much like its northern neighbor Xinjiang. 

Xi’s visit indicates Beijing attaches high importance to the region’s development, according to Xinhua, given the president is personally leading a central government delegation to Tibet for the first time. 

In a speech delivered at the ceremony in Tibet, Wang Huning, China’s No.4 official, called for ensuring border stability in the country’s fight against separatism. Cadres in the region should “strengthen innovative social governance, and form an iron wall for maintaining stability,” he said.

Xi previously made a trip to Tibet in 2021 — more than three decades after Jiang Zemin became the last Chinese leader to visit the region. 

It appears Xi flew directly into Lhasa, a city at an altitude of about 3,650 meters (12,000 feet), without first stopping along the way to acclimatize as he did during his last trip in 2021.

For the Chinese leader, who turned 72 in June, it was a “health flex,” Victor Shih, a professor at the University of California, San Diego, said on X.

As he met with local officials, Xi also called for progress on delivering key infrastructure projects in the region. Chief among these is the massive 1.2 trillion yuan ($167 billion) mega-dam, which is three times the size of the Three Gorges Dam.

The dam could also become a source of tension between China and India, as the river runs through the state of Arunachal Pradesh in northeast India and feeds into the Brahmaputra River, which then flows into Bangladesh. China has said it’s talked with countries downstream about the project.

During Wang’s visit, India reiterated its concern about the dam’s construction, which it said “will have implications for lower riparian states,” and called “for utmost transparency in this regard.”

Major ventures such as the Yarlung Tsangpo hydropower project and the Sichuan-Tibet railway must be advanced with “strength, order and efficiency,” Xinhua cited Xi as saying on Wednesday. 

The Chinese leader also urged Tibet to develop agriculture and clean energy, while promoting the integration of culture and tourism.

“The Chinese fear seems to be about inner Tibetan thinking — a fear that Tibetans are still disloyal in their hearts even after more than 70 years under Chinese rule,” said Barnett, who also headed Columbia University’s Modern Tibetan Studies Program until 2018 and writes extensively about the region.

“Exceptional degrees of pressure and persuasion must have been used by local officials to achieve that display of total unity,” he said. “So the signaling of Xi’s visit so far seems very mixed indeed.”

--With assistance from Colum Murphy and Sudhi Ranjan Sen.

(Updates with analyst comments starting in fifth paragraph.)

More stories like this are available on My Healthty Life

©2025 My Healthty LifeL.P.

Red States Push for Soda Ban Legislation

Red States Push for Soda Ban Legislation

M Hasan    7:04 AM   

The Rise of Soda and Candy Bans in SNAP Programs

Republican-led states are taking a bold step by pushing to ban soda and candy from their food stamp programs, aligning with the "Make America Healthy Again" (MAHA) movement. This initiative has shifted traditional political lines, as both parties have shown interest in restricting sugary drinks within the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). However, it is the Trump administration that has taken the lead in encouraging states to implement such changes.

Colorado stands out as the only blue state to receive approval for a soda ban waiver. It also proposed expanding SNAP benefits alongside limiting their scope. While previous attempts at regulating soda have largely focused on blue cities, such as New York City under Mayor Michael Bloomberg, the current push under MAHA has seen a shift in support toward Republican states.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the face of MAHA, has been working closely with Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins to promote these bans. Although he does not run SNAP, which is managed by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), his influence has been significant. In just six months, 12 state waivers have been approved by USDA to restrict SNAP recipients from purchasing certain items like soft drinks, sugary beverages, energy drinks, and candy.

Kennedy has emphasized the importance of free choice, stating that while individuals should be able to buy sugary drinks, the U.S. taxpayer should not bear the cost. The states that have claimed these waivers include Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Texas, Utah, and West Virginia.

However, the idea of policing the shopping carts of low-income Americans has raised concerns among anti-hunger advocates. They argue that such restrictions are paternalistic and stigmatizing. Additionally, nutrition experts point out that there is limited evidence showing that these bans lead to better health outcomes. Joelle Johnson, deputy director for Healthy Food Access at the Center for Science in the Public Interest, noted that there is no solid evidence to support claims that these restrictions will reduce diet-related diseases.

The SNAP waivers are part of pilot programs, allowing states to conduct research on the impact of these restrictions. Barry Popkin, a professor of nutrition at the University of North Carolina, believes these waivers are more about showing support for MAHA than making meaningful changes. He argues that they do little more than allow states to claim they can’t buy junk food.

Historically, some Republicans have supported soda bans as a way to cut spending on SNAP. Advocates remain skeptical about the latest push, especially given the broader efforts to reduce SNAP funding. The Foundation for Government Accountability, a conservative think tank, has been actively promoting these waivers, aiming to reshape public assistance programs and cut spending.

Experts warn of a potential slippery slope, where restricting eligible items could lead to reduced benefits for SNAP participants. Priya Fielding-Singh, director of policy and programs at the George Washington University’s Global Food Institute, suggests that any moves to restrict purchases should be paired with efforts to improve access to healthy food. So far, none of the red state waivers have addressed this issue.

Governor Jared Polis of Colorado praised the waiver as a step toward improving health outcomes and reducing obesity rates. However, the Trump administration has not yet approved a separate waiver for hot foods like rotisserie chicken or soup. Democratic governors Laura Kelly of Kansas and Katie Hobbs of Arizona have vetoed bills that would have allowed their states to submit similar waivers.

Kennedy has expressed hope that more blue states will follow suit, citing commitments from Democratic governors. However, he acknowledges that some may not want to be associated with the MAHA branding due to its partisan connotations. Rollins emphasized that healthy eating should be bipartisan, stating that the USDA is working with every state to promote healthier choices.

As the debate continues, the focus remains on whether these bans are truly about promoting health or if they are part of a larger effort to shrink SNAP. The distinction between these goals is crucial, as the future of the program and its impact on low-income families hangs in the balance.