Monday, August 18, 2025

The Secret I've Carried for 56 Years — Now Revealed to Save Lives

The Secret I've Carried for 56 Years — Now Revealed to Save Lives

Featured Image

A Personal Story of Abortion Before Legalization

In 1957, as I prepared to leave England for the United States, my mother offered me some final advice. Instead of the usual words of wisdom about marriage or life, she gave me a method to terminate a pregnancy. She suggested boiling half a bottle of red wine and drinking it while it was hot, then standing on a chair and jumping off several times. Her recommendation was unusual, but not uncommon at the time.

At that point in history, abortion was not only illegal but also dangerous. In the United Kingdom, many women used knitting needles to end their pregnancies, while in the United States, wire coat hangers were a common tool. My mother believed her method was safer. However, I found her advice amusing and did not take it seriously. I planned to be fitted with a diaphragm upon arriving in America, as I was confident I could avoid unplanned pregnancies.

Upon my arrival, I looked up obstetricians in the yellow pages and found a doctor nearby. To my disappointment, she refused to fit me, stating I should return after I was married. This was the same policy in Britain, where contraception was only available to married women. My wedding was just two weeks away, and I wondered what this doctor thought would happen on my honeymoon.

Our first child, Ruth, was born two years after our marriage, followed by Dan 21 months later. Caring for two young children was exhausting, but I found it exhilarating. Watching them grow was like witnessing a miracle. Then, three and a half years later, I discovered I was pregnant again.

During my morning sickness, Ruth and Dan both contracted German measles, or rubella. I knew the risks—pregnancy during the first trimester could lead to serious birth defects, including deafness, cataracts, heart problems, developmental disabilities, and even stillbirth. When I asked my obstetrician what he would do if I caught rubella, he simply shrugged and said, “Nothing.” A friend who had the same experience attempted suicide and spent the rest of her life in a vegetative state.

After our third child, Jonathan, was born, we moved to Berkeley, where I was fitted with an IUD. Ezra’s architectural practice was thriving, and he was teaching at UC Berkeley. He often traveled, leaving me to manage three children with different needs. I felt overwhelmed and inadequate as a parent.

In 1969, when Jonathan entered kindergarten, I returned to my studies at the University of California. Life finally felt more balanced. But one morning, I woke up with the familiar signs of early pregnancy. I denied the possibility at first, relying on my IUD, which I believed to be 99% effective. However, I was part of that unlucky 1%.

The thought of carrying a baby alongside the IUD terrified me. What damage could it cause? More importantly, I couldn’t handle another child. Life was just beginning to feel normal, and the idea of a fourth child filled me with dread.

I made an appointment with my obstetrician, who confirmed the pregnancy. I told him I was resigned to having another baby, but he sensed my reluctance. “Go home and talk to your husband,” he said. “If you decide you don’t want to continue, call my office and say you’re bleeding heavily. I’ll meet you at the hospital.”

I was stunned. For the first time, I felt a sense of relief. The doctor was offering me a choice, something I never thought possible. After discussing it with Ezra, we both agreed we didn’t want another child.

The next day, I called the doctor’s office and lied about heavy bleeding. Ezra drove me to the hospital, where we met the doctor. As I was wheeled into the operating room, the nurse squeezed my hand and said, “You’ll be fine.” That was the last thing I remembered.

When I awoke, I was relieved and grateful. Ezra brought me my favorite ice cream, and we shared our feelings of relief. I didn’t tell anyone about the procedure. I was afraid of the legal consequences, and I kept the secret until now.

Had my doctor not offered this option, I might have gone to Mexico or faced the dangers of illegal procedures. Many women suffered from botched abortions or lacked access to healthcare altogether. I was risk-averse and would have likely carried the pregnancy to term, leading to a life of exhaustion and resentment.

Today, at 92, I still feel anger toward legislators who force women to carry pregnancies against their will. Women are often portrayed as foolish teenagers, but many mature women with families face these difficult decisions. Right-to-life advocates focus on rare procedures while ignoring the suffering of women who undergo them.

I share my story now because I believe it can help wake people up to the dangers of restricting reproductive rights. We are returning to a time when women are denied control over their bodies. Doctors fear following the example of my obstetrician, and women with complications are left to suffer.

Stories of regret after abortion are common in antiabortion circles, but my experience was the opposite. It allowed us to have the family we wanted. I have no regrets.

I will always be grateful to my doctor, who risked his career to help me. Now, women are forced to resort to unsafe methods, just as they did before abortion became legal. We are returning to the days of coat hangers and knitting needles.

Cynthia Ehrenkrantz is a writer and storyteller. She was born in Britain and immigrated to the United States in 1957. Her memoir, “Seeking Shelter: Memoir of a Jewish Girlhood in Wartime Britain,” is available wherever books are sold. She lives in Westchester County, New York.

A New Reality for Terminal Cancer: Longer Lives, Chronic Uncertainty

A New Reality for Terminal Cancer: Longer Lives, Chronic Uncertainty

Featured Image

A New Era of Cancer Treatment

Gwen Orilio didn’t know how long she had to live after her stage-four lung cancer diagnosis. The disease had already infiltrated her eye, so the 31-year-old didn’t bother opening a retirement account. Ten years later, Orilio is still alive. And she still has metastatic cancer.

Keeping her going is a string of new treatments that don’t cure the disease but can buy months—even years—of time, with the hope that once one drug stops working, a new one will come along. Orilio started on chemotherapy, and then switched to a new treatment, and then another, and another, and another. “What’s next? What do I have lined up for when this one stops working?” said Orilio, a high-school math teacher who lives in Garner, N.C. “My motto is that the science just needs to stay a step ahead of me, and so far it’s been working.”

This past winter, she started a retirement fund at age 41. Orilio is part of a new era of cancer treatment challenging the idea of what it means to have and survive cancer. A small but growing population is living longer with incurable or advanced cancer, navigating the rest of their lives with a disease increasingly akin to a chronic illness. The trend, which started in breast cancer, has expanded to patients with melanoma, kidney cancer, lung cancer, and others.

The new drugs can add years to a life, even for some diagnoses like Orilio’s that were once swift death sentences. They also put people in a state of limbo, living on a knife’s edge waiting for the next scan to say a drug has stopped working and doctors need to find a new one. The wide range of survival times has made it more difficult for cancer doctors to predict how much time a patient might have left. For most, the options eventually run out.

Patients contend with side effects from ongoing treatment—and their cancer—like crushing fatigue or nerve damage, but they often don’t look sick. Other, more routine health problems and the financial toll of multiple rounds of drugs also matter more when a person lives for years, instead of months.

“I have a problem with the narrative of cancer being contained to something that is either cure or die,” said Dr. Lori Spoozak, a gynecologic oncologist and palliative medicine doctor at the University of Kansas Cancer Center. “The experience our patients go through is much more complicated than that.”

Cancer as Chronic Illness

The U.S. is currently home to more than 18 million cancer survivors, over 5% of the total population, and their ranks are expected to grow to 26 million by 2040. Those living with the disease are included among them. More than 690,000 people were projected to be living with stage-four or metastatic disease of the six most common cancers—melanoma, breast, bladder, colorectal, prostate or lung cancer—in 2025, according to a 2022 report from the National Cancer Institute. That’s an increase from 623,000 in 2018 and a significant rise since 1990, the report found.

Part of the increase is due to a rise in bladder and prostate cancers, and better diagnostic tools that recognize more stage-four cancers earlier, researchers said. But much of it is because those patients are living longer. Nearly 30% of survivors diagnosed with metastatic melanoma and 20% of those diagnosed with metastatic colorectal or breast cancer had been living with their disease for a decade or more, the NCI paper estimated.

More than 600,000 people in the U.S. die of cancer each year. Cancers that reach stage four and metastasize to the brain, liver or other body parts carry the worst odds. Many patients die within weeks. But a greater portion of patients across many cancers are now still alive five years after a late-stage diagnosis compared with two decades ago, federal data show.

“I can legitimately tell most of the people I meet that I think their survival is measured in years,” said Dr. Mark Lewis, director of gastrointestinal oncology at Intermountain Health in Utah. “More and more people are experiencing cancer as a chronic illness.”

Even for lung cancer, the biggest U.S. cancer killer, the five-year relative survival rate for advanced disease has inched up, from 3.7% for patients diagnosed in 2004 to 9.2% for patients diagnosed in 2017, federal data show. The overall lung cancer survival rate has risen by 26% in the past five years, according to the American Lung Association, as declining cigarette use, screening, and new drugs have driven down deaths.

Advancements in Treatment

The expanding number of therapies that target a cancer’s mutations or boost the immune system are improving the outlook for several cancers. In breast cancer, treatment for metastatic disease accounted for 29% of the drop in deaths between 1975 and 2019, according to one 2024 estimate, with screening and treatment for early-stage disease accounting for the rest.

Dr. Eric Winer, a breast cancer oncologist and the director of the Yale Cancer Center, has heard people talk about cancer becoming a chronic disease for decades. It had always been true for a small subset. “And now, in breast cancer, it’s true for a bigger proportion of patients with metastatic breast cancer.”

Starting around 2000, drugs that hit specific genetic abnormalities such as Herceptin for breast cancer and Gleevec for leukemia established a new class of targeted therapies, buoyed by a better understanding of cancer’s molecular underpinnings. Immunotherapies called checkpoint inhibitors entered in 2011 for melanoma. Keytruda, first approved in 2014, is one of the world’s top-selling drugs and used across 18 cancers. Advances snowballed.

“Just the availability of the therapeutic options and the advances has been tremendous,” said Dr. Robin Zon, director of breast oncology at Cincinnati Cancer Advisors and past president of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. “We’re able to be more precise about getting the right drug with the right person.”

Zon helped write new recommendations in April 2024 for survivor care for metastatic patients, including that they should be granted access to survivor programs often reserved for patients who have finished treatment.

The New Normal

As patients live longer, never fully free of the disease, the financial strain of scans, treatments and travel for care compounds with time. The immediate rush of support from friends and family fades as the emergency becomes routine. Regular scans and tests to see if cancer has progressed or returned can fill patients with so much dread that the feeling now has its own word: scanxiety.

Orilio feels it at every 12-week scan, wondering when the test will reveal bad news and she’ll need another new drug. “When I get the scan results, I can pretend I don’t have cancer for the next 12 weeks until I go get scanned again,” she said. “I try to live a normal life in between.”

Orilio has spent a decade in this “new normal.” In late 2014, a series of migraines and an eye exam led doctors to find a tumor in the back of Orilio’s eye. More scans and surgery followed. In her hospital room, the surgeon told her the cancer had started in her lung. It was stage four.

Orilio’s mind went to her daughter, who was 18 months old. Back at home, she told her husband that she was scared. It was the only time she’d ever seen him cry. “I told him he’s never allowed to leave me,” Orilio joked.

Tests revealed her cancer had a rare genetic alteration called a ROS1 fusion, boosting her odds of survival. ROS1 is one of several lung-cancer alterations vulnerable to targeted drugs—drugs that hit the market for the first time right when she needed them.

Orilio switched from chemotherapy to a drug called crizotinib, which helps block specific proteins that drive cancer growth. The drug would go on to become the first treatment for ROS1-positive lung cancer patients approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2016.

That worked for Orilio until 2017, when the cancer appeared in her brain. Her doctor said surgery or whole brain radiation was next. Orilio was so scared that she got on a plane to Boston to see a doctor who specializes in ROS1. She enrolled in a clinical trial for a drug called lorlatinib, and the spots in her brain disappeared.

Four years of calm followed. Then, Orilio’s cancer developed a mutation on the ROS1 gene that made lorlatinib ineffective. She tried yet another experimental drug that bought her several more months, and she’s had several rounds of radiation throughout her treatment. Now, she’s on zidesamtinib, which has worked for around three years and counting. The drugmaker, Nuvalent, announced positive data for the drug in June.

Orilio takes the pill every morning before she brushes her teeth. Like most of the treatments she’s tried, it makes her feel fatigued. She also put on weight. Her doctor is already thinking about what drug might be next—and trying to develop new options with her research team.

“It’s hard because cancer is so smart,” said Dr. Jessica J. Lin, a lung cancer specialist at Mass General Brigham in Boston, who is Orilio’s doctor. “We know at some point cancer is going to figure out a way to escape the treatment again.”

Many of Lin’s patients, including Orilio, are at least five years out from a metastatic diagnosis. She hears their stories about weddings and graduations at the same time she walks them through the possible options for when the cancer returns. The disease still cuts most of their lives short.

“You are having to walk that fine line between trying to be as realistic and transparent as possible—and we always try to be transparent—and making sure to relay that there is hope,” Lin said.

Orilio knows the odds are stacked against her, but she is more optimistic now than she was in the beginning. She didn’t look up lung cancer statistics until more than a year after her diagnosis, when the treatment was working and she felt more confident that she might live.

Persistence in Precarity

The teacher, who also coaches track, fights through her fatigue to take high-school students through math lessons and warm-up drills. She no longer demonstrates the long jump, her favorite event, because the cancer has spread to her spine.

In the classroom, she sometimes writes facts about lung cancer on her whiteboard and answers students’ questions: Did she smoke cigarettes? (She didn’t.) Does she still have cancer? (She does.) What about her thick head of hair? (It grew back differently after chemo.)

“I just paint a new image of what stage-four cancer looks like,” Orilio said.

Even the adults in her community often assume she’s cured, said Orilio, who sometimes has to correct them while at her daughter’s weekend soccer games.

When she was diagnosed, Orilio’s co-workers rallied around her and put on a 5K, raising tens of thousands of dollars. Her annual copays of about $5,000 have slowly eaten away at that cushion.

“If the cancer took a turn for the worse, the support would be there,” Orilio said. “But it almost feels a little bit lonely when I don’t have all of the support all the time.”

The house Orilio shares with her husband and daughter is oversize. The couple had planned on having more children. But Orilio started treatment right away because of the cancer’s aggressiveness, leaving no time to freeze her eggs. She wanted to be there for the child that she does have.

Her daughter is now a tween, and Orilio sometimes daydreams about what life will look like when she goes off to college and what she might do in retirement. Other days, she wonders why she bothers to save any money at all. The family does stretch their budget for the sake of fun at times, including during a spring break trip to Universal Orlando earlier this year.

“That was not a cheap trip,” Orilio said. “But it was, you know, making the memories, which is more important to me now.”

In late June, after Orilio’s latest scans showed no signs of trouble, they loaded up the camper and drove to her family’s lake house in New York. The trio paddleboarded, played soccer and ate more ice cream than they are normally allowed at home. A gaggle of extended family joined in mid-July. They celebrated her 42nd birthday.

Aside from taking her daily pill, Orilio hasn’t been thinking about her cancer much. “I have the summer to be free,” she said.

Her next round of scans is scheduled for September.

Bat Colony Found in Grand Teton Lodge Sparks Rabies Concerns

Bat Colony Found in Grand Teton Lodge Sparks Rabies Concerns

Featured Image

Rabies Exposure Risk Following Bat Colony Discovery in Grand Teton National Park

A significant rabies exposure risk has been identified after a suspected bat colony was discovered within a lodge in Grand Teton National Park. Officials from the National Park Service and state health departments have issued warnings, indicating that hundreds of individuals may have come into contact with the bats. The situation involves the Jackson Lake Lodge, a well-known eco-hotel and historic site located within the park.

The bat colony was first detected over the past few months, with the National Park Service noting that the animals were nesting in an attic space above several guest rooms. The discovery led to the closure of those rooms as a precaution while public health officials conduct investigations and provide recommendations for mitigation. According to the agency, there is no immediate threat to the public at this time.

Since June 2, the Grand Teton Lodge Company, which operates the Jackson Lake Lodge, has received eight reports from overnight guests who may have been exposed to bats in their rooms. These reports prompted further investigation, revealing the presence of the colony in the attic area. The affected rooms were closed to ensure the safety of guests and staff.

State health officials are reaching out to guests who stayed at the lodge between May 5 and July 27 to conduct rabies risk assessments. Those who meet the criteria for preventive treatment will be connected with appropriate healthcare providers in their home states. Guests are urged to contact the Grand Teton Lodge Company to confirm if they stayed in one of the potentially affected rooms.

Tracking Exposed Individuals Across Multiple States and Countries

Health officials have confirmed that affected guests came from 38 U.S. states and seven countries. As part of the response, state and local health officials are working to track down all individuals who may have been exposed. Hotel employees are also being contacted, though they are considered to be at lower risk compared to guests who stayed in the affected rooms.

Approximately 250 reservations for impacted rooms were recorded between May and July, with an estimated 500 people staying in the cabins during that period. Travis Riddell, director of the Teton County Public Health Department, noted that while many people were exposed, officials are confident they have identified all individuals involved.

Some dead bats were found and sent to the Wyoming State Veterinary Laboratory for examination. As of August 15, none of the bats tested positive for rabies. However, the number of bats found is believed to represent only a small portion of the entire colony.

Importance of Bats in the Ecosystem

Despite the concerns surrounding rabies, the National Park Service emphasized the ecological importance of bats in Grand Teton National Park. These creatures play a vital role in maintaining the balance of the ecosystem by controlling insect populations, including mosquitoes. The most common bat species in the area include little brown bats, big brown bats, silver-haired bats, and others.

The National Park Service advises visitors to avoid direct contact with wildlife and to report any unusual animal behavior. If bitten or scratched, individuals should wash the area thoroughly with warm water and soap and seek medical attention immediately. The agency also recommends following guidelines to minimize the risk of rabies exposure.

Historical Context of Rabies in Teton County

This incident marks the first mass rabies exposure event in Teton County since 2017. Prior to that, rabies in bats was rare in the region. In 2017, thirteen people were treated preemptively after a bat colony was discovered at the AMK Ranch, a research facility in the park. Since then, rabies in bats has been confirmed almost annually in the area.

Rabies is a viral disease that can spread to humans and pets through the bites or scratches of infected animals. It is primarily found in bats and skunks in Wyoming. Although rabies is fatal, it is preventable through vaccination and prompt medical care. The disease affects the central nervous system and can lead to severe brain damage and death if not treated before symptoms appear.

Bats are particularly concerning due to the small size of their bites and scratches, which may go unnoticed. Even though rabies in animals is rare, exposure involving bats is taken very seriously due to the potential fatality if left untreated.

Scouted: I Tried Tru Niagen’s NAD+ Supplements for a Month—Here’s the Result

Scouted: I Tried Tru Niagen’s NAD+ Supplements for a Month—Here’s the Result

Featured Image

Understanding NAD+ and Its Role in Health

NAD+ (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide) has become a buzzword in the wellness world, especially among those interested in longevity and healthspan. As someone who’s diving into a longevity-focused lifestyle, I’ve noticed an increasing number of mentions about NAD+ on social media. While many people may not be familiar with it, its potential to enhance cellular function and support overall well-being is gaining attention.

NAD+ is a coenzyme found in all living cells, playing a crucial role in energy production and DNA repair. It helps convert food into energy and supports the body's natural repair processes. However, as we age, NAD+ levels naturally decline, which is why many are turning to supplements to maintain optimal levels.

The Science Behind NAD+ Supplements

One of the most popular supplements for boosting NAD+ is Tru Niagen, which contains a patented form of nicotinamide riboside (NR), a precursor to NAD+. NR is considered one of the most effective ways to increase NAD+ levels in the body. According to research, this supplement can significantly elevate NAD+ levels within a few weeks.

Dr. Andrew Shao, Senior Vice President of Global Regulatory and Scientific Affairs at Niagen Bioscience, explains that NAD+ levels start to decline in our 30s and continue to decrease with each passing decade. This decline is linked to various aging-related issues, making NAD+ supplementation a promising avenue for those looking to support their health.

Why Oral Supplementation?

While there are various methods to boost NAD+ levels, such as intravenous (IV) therapy or intranasal administration, oral supplementation offers a more convenient and affordable option. Dr. Nayan Patel, PharmD, founder of Auro Wellness, notes that direct oral supplementation with NAD+ itself is ineffective due to poor absorption. Instead, precursors like NR and NMN are more effective because they can be absorbed through the digestive system.

Tru Niagen Pro, which contains 1,000mg of Niagen, has been shown to raise NAD+ levels by up to 150% in three weeks. This makes it a viable alternative for those seeking to improve their health without the cost and inconvenience of IV therapy.

Personal Experience with Tru Niagen

I have been taking Tru Niagen Pro for a month and have noticed significant changes in my daily life. My sleep quality has improved, and I feel more alert and focused throughout the day. I no longer experience the usual morning fatigue, even when my children wake up early. I’ve also felt more motivated to engage in physical activities like walking and Pilates.

The effects were subtle at first, but over time, I’ve felt a noticeable improvement in my overall energy and well-being. It’s not the jitters of caffeine, but rather a sense of being well-rested and rejuvenated.

How Long Does It Take to Feel the Effects?

I experienced changes within just a few days of starting Tru Niagen, which is faster than many other supplements. Research suggests that measurable effects can occur within a week, although the timeline can vary from person to person. Compared to NAD+ shots, which provide immediate results, oral supplementation takes a bit longer to build up, but the benefits are still evident.

Should You Take Tru Niagen Long-Term?

Consistency is key when it comes to NAD+ supplementation. Dr. Shao emphasizes that ongoing use allows the body to fully benefit from the support provided by NAD+ restoration. Like other foundational health practices, regular use is essential for long-term results.

Final Thoughts and Recommendations

While NAD+ supplements like Tru Niagen show promise, they should be part of a comprehensive health strategy that includes proper nutrition, exercise, and adequate sleep. Dr. Julianna Lindsey, a physician specializing in anti-aging medicine, advises consulting with a healthcare professional before starting any new supplement regimen.

For me, the decision to continue using Tru Niagen is based on the positive changes I've experienced and the strong clinical research supporting the product. It has genuinely made a difference in my life, and I believe it could do the same for others looking to enhance their health and well-being.

'Burned Out and Broken': Nurse Exposes Staffing Crisis at Children's Cancer Unit

'Burned Out and Broken': Nurse Exposes Staffing Crisis at Children's Cancer Unit

Featured Image

The Struggles of a Whistleblower in the Children’s Cancer Unit

Hannah Farrell, a former nurse at the Royal Belfast Hospital for Sick Children, has spoken out about her experience working in the Children's Cancer Unit. She resigned in 2019 due to overwhelming staff shortages and a lack of support from management. Farrell described the system as leaving her broken, disillusioned, and burnt out. She emphasized that the issues she faced were not new, but rather part of a long-standing problem that continued to affect the unit.

According to Farrell, maternity leave, long-term sickness, and career breaks were often not backfilled, leading to understaffing on the wards. This placed an immense burden on the remaining nurses, potentially impacting patient care. When a ward reaches crisis levels, the trust reportedly pulls nurses from other areas, which only provides a temporary solution and negatively affects other departments.

Farrell also shared her personal struggles with the emotional toll of her job. She was responsible for treating some of Northern Ireland’s sickest children, often dealing with the pain of a patient's death. However, she was not offered any professional counseling and had to pay for it herself. The Belfast Health Trust responded by stating that they provide individualized support through their occupational health services and encourage staff to raise concerns with their teams and line managers.

Despite the trust's statements, Farrell said that nothing has changed since she left five years ago. She expressed hope that speaking out would help other nurses who feel their voices are silenced by management. “The system took my fight, my joy, my empathy and compassion—there was nothing left to give,” she said. “I dreaded every shift because I didn’t know what I was going into, staffing-wise, or what the skill mix would be.”

Impact on Patients and Families

The Children’s Cancer Unit is the regional center where children in Northern Ireland receive treatment for cancer or complex blood disorders. Specialist cancer nurses are trained to administer treatments like chemotherapy. However, seven out of 12 specialist nurses are currently off work, which led to some treatment delays earlier this year. According to the trust, about five children were affected, but they have since received their treatment.

Parents of patients treated in the haematology and oncology wards have shared their experiences with the challenges faced by the nursing staff. David and Sara Watson, whose son Adam underwent treatment for acute myeloid leukaemia, highlighted the pressure on nurses. They noted that while the clinical service is world-class, staffing issues have been a persistent problem. Adam, who passed away in 2022, helped establish the B Positive charity to support families and provide counseling to nurses on the ward.

The Department of Health acknowledged the staffing challenges facing the Belfast Trust and recognized the efforts made to manage recent nurse staffing issues in paediatric haematology and oncology. They also noted assurances from the trust that service delivery is being closely monitored.

A System in Crisis

Caroline and Martin Smyth, whose son Theo was treated at the cancer unit in 2020, described how staff shortages impacted the wards. They mentioned that the 10-bed ward was often full, yet there was not always a full quota of staff, especially during weekends. The Belfast Trust stated that there are currently no nursing registrant vacancies at the Children’s Haematology Unit and that all nursing roles in the haematology and oncology departments have been reviewed. This allows the trust to utilize staff from other areas and bank staff to safely cover the service when needed.

Farrell, who still works as a nurse in the health service, said the unit is operating on the "fumes" of the nurses’ good nature. She described her last three overnight shifts as "horrendous," with too much responsibility placed on her shoulders. She oversaw a full ward of seriously-ill children, supported only by a bank and a junior nurse, which ultimately broke her.

She emphasized that the children and families deserved the highest level of care but felt she lacked the ability and support to deliver it. Farrell criticized the NHS for promoting an "it's OK to not be OK" attitude around mental health, yet expecting nurses to give more than they can. She still recalls the names and faces of the 56 children who died in her care, but never received any professional support.

Calls for Change

Parents of sick children continue to call for help with costs and better support for the nursing staff. The ongoing challenges at the Children’s Cancer Unit highlight a broader issue within the healthcare system. As the trust continues to address staffing issues, many believe that real change requires a deeper understanding of the skills and resources needed to properly run such a critical department.